LGBT Criticism: “Agua de Mayo” by Maryanne Moll
Roland Raymond A.
Roldan LIT230 Prado Ateneo de Naga University
In
Maryanne Moll’s “Agua de Mayo,” one can say that lesbianism is seen the
expressions of love between two girls: the protagonist, Clara, who is also the
narrator and Anita, her cousin from Manila. According to the Adrienne Rich,
there are many ways to identify a lesbian and one of which is
women-dentification; and this is the case in the story. It begins with the
present Clara’s definition of true love. She compares it to a ghost, elusive
and fleeting yet unforgettable. In this introduction, she is referring to Anita
who is her true love. She then proceeds to tell the story about her true love. As
such, the narrator, present-day Clara indirectly identifies herself as lesbian.
Besides
this self-identification, Rich says that women may define themselves as being
in the lesbian continuum which consists
of experiences that woman go through in loving another woman. She concludes
that to be identified as lesbian does not require sexual desire nor intimacy
with other women, but it does not preclude them either. In the story, one can
see this lesbian continuum in the
shared experiences of Clara and Anita as they express their lesbian feelings during
moments such as: 1) Kissing a number of times and physical/sexual intimacy -
“Under the covers, she moved to cover my body with hers…she began to kiss my
neck…her hand slowly slipping up the hem of my nightgown to my waist,” 2) when
Clara declares to Anita, “Take me away…To Manila!” and 3) when Anita says to
Clara “I love you and I’ll always be here. I love you. Remember that,” and then
risks her life to save Clara who nearly drowns in the creek.
Given
these instances of lesbian expression, one can say that the story successfully
portrays homosexual relationships to be as real as any heterosexual relationship.
However, that Clara and Anita did not speak of it, nor show their feelings in public,
because the society in which they live in does not acknowledge its existence
nor accept it, shows their blind acceptance of heterosexist values. This can
also be seen when they do not fight for their relationship when it was
threatened by Clara’s pending marriage to Carlos. Additionally, the fateful
death of Anita leaves the reader questioning whether or not they would have
continued their relationship if Anita had lived. Furthermore, the consummated
marriage of Clara to Carlos questions her identity yet again, if she is,
indeed, lesbian. Moreover, in the story, there was no mention of other lesbian
relationships she could have had after Anita.
The
lesbian love between Clara and Anita is likened to a ghost. Aside from its
characteristics found in the beginning of the story, lesbian love and ghosts
are implied as being real even when left unacknowledged or even unrecognized.
Appearances of Greta, possibly a ghost whose identity cannot be ascertained,
speaking “true love” a number of times can be seen as a representation of the momentary
arousals of desire between Clara and Anita as their feelings for one another surface
and become explicit. The lingering jasmine scent of the ghost after it
disappears is also comparable to the lingering quality of the love between the
two even after Anita’s death. In one scene, Clara sees the reflection of the
ghost’s face which looks like her; and the blurring of her vision made the two
faces come together. This could represent the identity crisis she is going
through as she explores her sexuality by sharing intimate moments with someone
like her – a girl. Clara’s own heterosexist reactions to her feelings and
desires is shown in an instance when she had a nightmare right after a night of
sexual intimacy with Anita. The ghost is seen crawling in her bedroom with its
face covered and Clara being fearful of looking at it. This dream could mean
that Clara, though acknowledging her lesbian feelings and expressing it outwardly
to Anita, cannot face its immorality as adjudged by the social norm. Her fear
resulting to physical rigidity during the nightmare, shows her deep-seated
feelings of denial, guilt helplessness and inability to cope with her
situation.
Water in the story may have been
used as a metaphor for the varied intensities of Clara and Anita’s desire for
each another. The creek with flowing water may represent the lesbian continuum and Clara’s desire to
wade in its waters as well as Anita’s statement “If I were to die, I’d rather
die in the water” may be viewed as their mutual consent to continue exploring
their relationship. This metaphor of water is also seen in the rain showers “agua
de mayo” which could mean to be the moments of love they shared. The rain
itself marks the beginning and end of this lesbian love affair - “It rained the
night she came; It was also raining the night she left.”
In
conclusion, the story shows how a young adolescent reacts to her homosexual
awakening amidst heterosexist values and ultimately accepts her fate,
imprisoned in a heterosexual marriage. Like agua
de mayo, her memory of her lesbian lover comes and goes, and like a ghost, her
homosexuality unrealized will continue to haunt her for the rest of her life.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento